Probate Tentative Rulings for Friday

Probate Tentative Rulings

Department 28-Courtroom 2F

Hon. George A. Miram

September 4, 2015

If a court appearance is required and the court has given the parties permission to appear telephonically at a hearing, parties can make arrangements to do so by contacting CourtCall, an independent vendor.  Parties must contact CourtCall at (888) 882-6878 no later than 4:30 p.m. on the court day prior to the hearing.

Approved Non-Appearance

Appearance Required

Continued or Dropped Matters

 

Case No

Case Name

Case No

Case Name

Court Call OK?

Case No

Case Name

 

087566

Conservatorship of Addiego

113102

125892

Phelan Trust

Phelan Trust

Petitions to establish trust interest over personal property//**GRANTED.

Yes

125312

Husary Trust

Continued to 9-18-15

 

088458

Conservatorship of Levick

123107

Estate of Savage

Motion for Summary Judgment//**Appear.

Yes

 

 

122967

Estate of Bross

123929

Estate of Schoene

Trial Setting//**Continued to January 11, 2016 for trial setting conference. The case does not appear to be ready for trial setting as significant discovery remains to be completed. Parties to jointly submit a trial setting statement at least five days before the new date set setting forth trial readiness, listing all witnesses to be called, length of trial, and setting froth all agreements with regard to documents for trial. A further description of issues in controversy is required.

Yes

 

 

 

125251

Estate of Samaniego

124089

Estate of Handrahan

Preliminary Distribution//The unopposed Petition is GRANTED.

 

 

 

 

125399

Estate of Halili

 

 

 

 

 

 

125565

Conservatorship of McCory

 

 

 

 

 

 

125852

Estate of Knuepfer

Order Required

 

*Appearance Ordered , Failure to Appear may cause Petition to be Denied or Opposition Stricken

 

 

 

 

125945

Estate of Daikuhara

Proof of Mailing Required, Bond set at $171,000 absent filing of written waivers

 

**Appearance Optional, However, failure to appear will be viewed as waiver of oral argument and the court may issue an order that differs from the tentative ruling based on argument presented by those who attend, or based on further consideration of the papers. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.  ,

© 2015 Superior Court of San Mateo County