May 19, 2013
Law & Motions Tentative Rulings
  • Law and Motion Department Tentative Ruling Line:  (650) 363-1882
  • Other Judges' tentatives: please reference the appropriate Case Number and Case Caption below and contact the appropriate department.

Telephonic Appearances (CourtCall): If an appearance is required or if a party has provided timely notice of intent to appear by 4:00 p.m. to the court and all parties, any party may appear telephonically through CourtCall. To do so, you must contact CourtCall at (888) 882-6878 no later than 4:30 p.m. on the court day prior to the hearing. Notifying CourtCall with your intent to appear is not an alternative to notifying the court. Please visit their website for more information. Please also see California Rule of Court No. 3.670.

In the Superior Court of the State of California

In and for the County of San Mateo

 

Law and Motion Calendar

Judge: Honorable JOSEPH E. BERGERON

Department 4

 

400 County Center, Redwood City

Courtroom 2B

 

May 15, 2013

 

If you plan to appear on any case on this calendar,

 you must call (650) 363-1882 before 4:00 p.m. and you must give notice also before 4:00 p.m. to all parties of your intent to appear pursuant to California Rules of Court 3.1308(a)(1).

 

Case                   Title / Nature of Case

1

CIV 486889    WENDY WILLIAMS VS. CHAHRAM NOGHRESTCHI

 

 

WENDY WILLIAMS                                  JEFFREY T. MAKOFF

CHAHRAM NOGHRESTCHI                             JOHN F. PRENTICE

 

 

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT BY WENDY WILLIAMS

 

 

·         Plaintiff Wendy Williams’ unopposed Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint is GRANTED.  See, Code of Civ. Proc. Sec. 473(a). 

 

·         Plaintiff shall file and serve an amended pleading in conformity with the proposed amended complaint within 20 days.  

 

 

______________________________________________________________________

 

9:00

2

CIV 502902    THE EL CERRITO PLAZA CONDOMINIUM VS. WALTER GRADNEY

 

 

THE EL CERRITO PLAZA CONDOMINIUM                ANDREA L. O'TOOLE

WALTER GRADNEY                                  PRO/PER

 

 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: WHY ORDER FOR SALE OF DWELLING SHOULD NOT BE MADE BY THE EL CERRITO PLAZA CONDOMINIUM

 

 

·         The Plaintiff/Judgment Creditor The El Cerrito Plaza Condominium Association’s Application for an Order for Sale of Dwelling is GRANTED. 

 

·         The judgment creditor concedes that the judgment debtor is entitled to a homestead exemption but that the amount of the exemption is $75,000.  

 

·         Moving party is directed to prepare a written order consistent with the Court’s ruling for the Court’s signature, pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312, and to provide notice thereof to the opposing party/counsel as required by law and the California Rules of Court.  The order is to be submitted directly to Judge Joseph E. Bergeron, Department 4. 

 

 

______________________________________________________________________

 

9:00

3

CIV 507915    VERA KAZAKOFF VS. ASBESTOS COMPANIES, ET AL.

 

 

VERA KAZAKOFF                                   ROGER E. GOLD

ASBESTOS COMPANIES

 

 

MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY 17.1 BY THE SHERWIN WILLIAMS COMPANY

 

·         The three discovery motions brought by Sherwin-Williams Company have been taken off calendar at the request of the moving party. 

 

 

MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE BY THE SHERWIN WILLIAMS COMPANY

 

·         See tentative ruling above. 

 

 

MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSES TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, SET ONE BY THE SHERWIN WILLIAMS COMPANY

 

·         See tentative ruling above. 

 

 

______________________________________________________________________

 

9:00

4

CIV 511486    WAYNE T. KENNEDY, ET AL. VS. LEONARD BIALER, ET AL.

 

 

WAYNE T. KENNEDY                                HELENE A. SIMVOULAKIS

LEONARD BIALER                                  ARON K. LIANG

 

 

DEMURRER TO 1st Amended COMPLAINT of KENNEDY BY LEONARD BIALER

 

·         Matters continued to July 9, 2013 in the Law and Motion Department. 

 

 

DEMURRER TO 1st Amended COMPLAINT of KENNEDY BY SHERRY S. BIALER

 

·         See tentative ruling above. 

 

 

______________________________________________________________________

 

9:00

5

CIV 513783  SHIRLEY GOSHKO VS. MILLS-PENINSULA HEALTH SERVICES, ET AL.

 

 

SHIRLEY GOSHKO                                  PRO/PER

MILLS-PENINSLA HEALTH SEVICES                   JAMES J. ZENERE

 

 

MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFF'S 1ST AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO CCP 435 & 436 BY MILLS-PENINSLA HEALTH SEVICES

 

·         Matters continued to June 3, 2013 on the court’s motion. 

 

 

DEMURRER TO 1st Amended COMPLAINT of GOSHKO BY MILLS-PENINSLA HEALTH SEVICES, PALO ALTO MEDICAL FOUNDATION, PALO ALTO FOUNDATION MEDICAL GROUP, ROBERT W. MERWIN, FLO FITZGERALD

 

·         See tentative ruling above. 

 

 

______________________________________________________________________

 

9:00

6

CLJ 510137    DISCOVER BANK VS. LORRAINE M. TALLIAN

 

 

DISCOVER BANK                                   BRIAN M. NGO

LORRAINE M. TALLIAN                             PRO/PER

 

 

MOTION TO ENTER JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO CCP 664.6 BY DISCOVER BANK

 

 

·         The MOTION TO ENTER JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO CCP 664.6 BY DISCOVER BANK is GRANTED. 

 

·         The declaration of Janet Brown establishes that defendant has failed to make the payments required by the parties stipulation for judgment and, despite written notice, she has not cured the default.  Pursuant to the terms of the parties’ stipulation, judgment shall be entered in favor of plaintiff for the sum of $14,920.50 plus any court costs claimed by the filing of a memorandum of costs. 

 

·         Moving party is directed to prepare a written order consistent with the Court’s ruling for the Court’s signature, pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312, and to provide notice thereof to the opposing party/counsel as required by law and the California Rules of Court.  The order is to be submitted directly to Judge Joseph E. Bergeron, Department 4. 

 

 

______________________________________________________________________

 

9:00

7

CLJ 516861    GIANNINI GARDEN ORNAMENTS, INC. VS. HYUN J. KIM

 

 

GIANNINI GARDEN ORNAMENTS, INC.                 ROBERT S. BARTLETT

HYUN J. KIM                                     PRO/PER

 

 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO COMPLAINT of GIANNINI GARDEN ORNAMENTS, INC. FILED BY GIANNINI GARDEN ORNAMENTS, INC.

 

 

·         The unopposed MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO COMPLAINT of GIANNINI GARDEN ORNAMENTS, INC. FILED BY GIANNINI GARDEN ORNAMENTS, INC. is GRANTED. 

 

·         The Plaintiff met its burden under Code of Civ. Proc. Sec. 437c(p)(1) that there is no defense to its causes of action for common counts in that it has proved each element of the causes of action entitling it to judgment in the amount of $21,564 in its favor and against defendant.  

 

·         The Defendant did not meet its burden to show the existence of a triable issue of material fact as to either cause of action or defense thereto. 

 

·         Moving party is directed to prepare a written order consistent with the Court’s ruling for the Court’s signature, pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312, and to provide notice thereof to the opposing party/counsel as required by law and the California Rules of Court.  The order is to be submitted directly to Judge Joseph E. Bergeron, Department 4. 

 

 

______________________________________________________________________

 

9:00

8

CLJ 520726    A&B PRODUCE, INC. VS. ANNABELLE CORP.

 

 

A&B PRODUCE, INC.                               DAVID J. COOK

ANNABELLE CORP.

 

 

HEARING FOR RIGHT TO ATTACH ORDER AND WRIT OF ATTACHMENT

 

 

·         The motion is denied.  CCP §484.040 requires that a copy of the summons and complaint, notice of hearing, application and any supporting affidavits must be served in compliance with CCP §1005.  Plaintiff has not provided any proof of service for the summons and complaint nor any of the documents regarding the motion. 

 

 

______________________________________________________________________

 

 

© 2013 Superior Court of San Mateo County