TO GIVE THE COURT NOTICE OF YOUR INTENT TO APPEAR, or if you have questions or problems relating to your case, please contact us via telephone.
- Law and Motion Department Tentative Ruling Line: (650) 363-1882
- Other Judges' tentatives: please reference the appropriate Case Number and Case Caption below and contact the appropriate department.
Telephonic Appearances (CourtCall): If an appearance is required or if a party has provided timely notice of intent to appear by 4:00 p.m. to the court and all parties, any party may appear telephonically through CourtCall. To do so, you must contact CourtCall at (888) 882-6878 no later than 4:30 p.m. on the court day prior to the hearing. Notifying CourtCall with your intent to appear is not an alternative to notifying the court. Please visit their website for more information. Please also see California Rule of Court No. 3.670.
In the Superior Court of the State of California
In and for the County of San Mateo
Law and Motion
Calendar
Judge: Honorable JOSEPH E. BERGERON
Department 4
400 County Center, Redwood
City Courtroom
2B
May 15, 2013 |
If you plan to appear on any case on this
calendar,
you must
call (650) 363-1882 before 4:00 p.m. and you must give notice also before
4:00 p.m. to all parties of your intent to appear pursuant to California
Rules of Court 3.1308(a)(1).
|
|
Case Title / Nature of Case |
1
CIV 486889 WENDY WILLIAMS VS. CHAHRAM NOGHRESTCHI
WENDY WILLIAMS JEFFREY T. MAKOFF
CHAHRAM NOGHRESTCHI JOHN F. PRENTICE
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT BY WENDY WILLIAMS
·
Plaintiff
Wendy Williams’ unopposed Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint is
GRANTED. See, Code of Civ. Proc. Sec. 473(a).
· Plaintiff shall file and serve an amended pleading in conformity with the proposed amended complaint within 20 days.
______________________________________________________________________
9:00
2
CIV 502902 THE EL CERRITO PLAZA CONDOMINIUM VS. WALTER GRADNEY
THE EL CERRITO PLAZA CONDOMINIUM ANDREA L. O'TOOLE
WALTER GRADNEY PRO/PER
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: WHY ORDER FOR SALE OF DWELLING SHOULD NOT BE MADE BY THE EL CERRITO PLAZA CONDOMINIUM
·
The
Plaintiff/Judgment Creditor The El Cerrito Plaza
Condominium Association’s Application for an Order for Sale of Dwelling is
GRANTED.
·
The
judgment creditor concedes that the judgment debtor is entitled to a homestead
exemption but that the amount of the exemption is $75,000.
·
Moving party
is directed to prepare a written order consistent with the Court’s ruling for
the Court’s signature, pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312, and
to provide notice thereof to the opposing party/counsel as required by law and
the California Rules of Court. The order
is to be submitted directly to Judge Joseph E. Bergeron, Department 4.
______________________________________________________________________
9:00
3
CIV 507915 VERA KAZAKOFF VS. ASBESTOS COMPANIES, ET AL.
VERA KAZAKOFF ROGER E. GOLD
ASBESTOS COMPANIES
MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY 17.1 BY THE SHERWIN WILLIAMS COMPANY
·
The three
discovery motions brought by Sherwin-Williams Company have been taken off calendar
at the request of the moving party.
MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE BY THE SHERWIN WILLIAMS COMPANY
·
See
tentative ruling above.
MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSES TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, SET ONE BY THE SHERWIN WILLIAMS COMPANY
·
See
tentative ruling above.
______________________________________________________________________
9:00
4
CIV 511486 WAYNE T. KENNEDY, ET AL. VS. LEONARD BIALER, ET AL.
WAYNE T. KENNEDY HELENE A. SIMVOULAKIS
LEONARD BIALER ARON K. LIANG
DEMURRER TO 1st Amended COMPLAINT of KENNEDY BY LEONARD BIALER
·
Matters
continued to July 9, 2013 in the Law and Motion Department.
DEMURRER TO 1st Amended COMPLAINT of KENNEDY BY SHERRY S. BIALER
·
See
tentative ruling above.
______________________________________________________________________
9:00
5
CIV 513783 SHIRLEY GOSHKO VS. MILLS-PENINSULA HEALTH SERVICES, ET AL.
SHIRLEY GOSHKO PRO/PER
MILLS-PENINSLA HEALTH SEVICES JAMES J. ZENERE
MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFF'S 1ST AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO CCP 435 & 436 BY MILLS-PENINSLA HEALTH SEVICES
·
Matters continued
to June 3, 2013 on the court’s motion.
DEMURRER TO 1st Amended COMPLAINT of GOSHKO BY MILLS-PENINSLA HEALTH SEVICES, PALO ALTO MEDICAL FOUNDATION, PALO ALTO FOUNDATION MEDICAL GROUP, ROBERT W. MERWIN, FLO FITZGERALD
·
See
tentative ruling above.
______________________________________________________________________
9:00
6
CLJ 510137 DISCOVER BANK VS. LORRAINE M. TALLIAN
DISCOVER BANK BRIAN M. NGO
LORRAINE M. TALLIAN PRO/PER
MOTION TO ENTER JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO CCP 664.6 BY DISCOVER BANK
·
The
MOTION TO ENTER JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO CCP 664.6 BY DISCOVER BANK is
GRANTED.
·
The
declaration of Janet Brown establishes that defendant has failed to make the
payments required by the parties stipulation for
judgment and, despite written notice, she has not cured the default. Pursuant to the terms of the parties’
stipulation, judgment shall be entered in favor of plaintiff for the sum of
$14,920.50 plus any court costs claimed by the filing of a memorandum of
costs.
·
Moving party
is directed to prepare a written order consistent with the Court’s ruling for
the Court’s signature, pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312, and
to provide notice thereof to the opposing party/counsel as required by law and
the California Rules of Court. The order
is to be submitted directly to Judge Joseph E. Bergeron, Department 4.
______________________________________________________________________
9:00
7
CLJ 516861 GIANNINI GARDEN ORNAMENTS, INC. VS. HYUN J. KIM
GIANNINI GARDEN ORNAMENTS, INC. ROBERT S. BARTLETT
HYUN J. KIM PRO/PER
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO COMPLAINT of GIANNINI GARDEN ORNAMENTS, INC. FILED BY GIANNINI GARDEN ORNAMENTS, INC.
·
The
unopposed MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO COMPLAINT of GIANNINI GARDEN
ORNAMENTS, INC. FILED BY GIANNINI GARDEN ORNAMENTS, INC. is GRANTED.
·
The Plaintiff
met its burden under Code of Civ. Proc. Sec. 437c(p)(1) that there is no
defense to its causes of action for common counts in that it has proved each
element of the causes of action entitling it to judgment in the amount of
$21,564 in its favor and against defendant.
·
The
Defendant did not meet its burden to show the existence of a triable issue of material fact as to either cause of action
or defense thereto.
·
Moving party
is directed to prepare a written order consistent with the Court’s ruling for
the Court’s signature, pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312, and
to provide notice thereof to the opposing party/counsel as required by law and
the California Rules of Court. The order
is to be submitted directly to Judge Joseph E. Bergeron, Department 4.
______________________________________________________________________
9:00
8
CLJ 520726 A&B PRODUCE, INC. VS. ANNABELLE CORP.
A&B PRODUCE, INC. DAVID J. COOK
ANNABELLE CORP.
HEARING FOR RIGHT TO ATTACH ORDER AND WRIT OF ATTACHMENT
·
The
motion is denied. CCP §484.040 requires
that a copy of the summons and complaint, notice of hearing, application and
any supporting affidavits must be served in compliance with CCP §1005. Plaintiff has not provided any proof of
service for the summons and complaint nor any of the documents regarding the
motion.
______________________________________________________________________